Search for: "Feder v. Hewlett-Packard Company" Results 61 - 80 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am by David G. Badertscher
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
Toward that end, Hewlett-Packard's one-two punch knocks paper into a digital format and places it onto the network with its Scanjet 7650n. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
 * Former judge says actions of AC and Battistelli"devoid of any legal basis"Prof Dr Siegfried Broß is a highly respected former judge, who sat for 12 years on the Patent Division of the Federal Court of Justice and for a further 12 years on the Federal Constitutional Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:00 pm
(NOV) suing a rival oil field supply company and four former employees in Texas; and IBM suing a former director of sales and current Hewlett Packard employee in California (claiming trade secret theft). [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm by A. Brian Albritton
In a rather remarkable case, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in a split decision affirmed an estimated $6.9 million qui tam award to two relators who, the Government argued, did not actually allege a claim against the defendant, Hewlett-Packard Company (HP): US ex rel Roberts et al. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:32 am
" Specifically, Ricoh claims that QSI induced infringement by its customers (e.g., Hewlett-Packard, Dell, and Gateway) as well as the end-users of the drives. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:31 am by gmlevine
“To allow Respondent’s claim that he has made post-filing changes to his website to alter the outcome of this dispute would open the door for all future respondents … to avoid the consequences of their actions,” Hewlett-Packard Company v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court unanimously held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:19 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Brief amicus curiae of Hewlett-Packard Co. et al. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:55 pm by Paul D. Knothe
Hewlett-Packard Co., the Ninth Circuit held that an employer was not required to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs by allowing the employee to post anti-gay signs quoting Biblical scriptures in the workplace. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Wells Fargo & Company et al (Docket Report) ITC finds no violation of s 337 by importation and sale of semiconductor integrated circuits by respondents LSI and Seagate (ITC Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps General Electric – ITC denies motion for summary determination of no inequitable conduct in certain variable speed wind turbines (ITC Law Blog) Greenshift - Greenshift seeks quick injunction against Cardinal Ethanol (Green Patent Blog)… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Wells Fargo & Company et al (Docket Report) ITC finds no violation of s 337 by importation and sale of semiconductor integrated circuits by respondents LSI and Seagate (ITC Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps General Electric – ITC denies motion for summary determination of no inequitable conduct in certain variable speed wind turbines (ITC Law Blog) Greenshift - Greenshift seeks quick injunction against Cardinal Ethanol (Green Patent Blog)… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 5:19 am by Broc Romanek
Say-on-Pay: A Fourth Failed Vote (and Perhaps a Fifth If You Do the Math) Yesterday, as reported in this Bloomberg article and ISS's Blog, Hewlett-Packard became the fourth company to fail to receive majority support for its say-on-pay, with 48% voting in favor. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 pm by Eric Schweibenz
’s (“APM”) motion to restrict the theories and evidence of importation that Complainants Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. [read post]