Search for: "Federal Cartridge Company"
Results 61 - 80
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
Impression Products and other companies bought the used Lexmark cartridges and solved the microchip problem, refilling the cartridges with toner and selling the refilled cartridges at a price lower than Lexmark’s price. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 10:10 am
Lexmark International, a technology company that makes printers and ink cartridges for those printers, has been selling its ink cartridges on the condition that they could not be refilled and resold after the initial sale. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 3:15 am
https://t.co/LbpdeZLmIY -> Dear EU, Please Fix the Transfer of Value https://t.co/GTwDlP2I7c -> Strike Three: Lexmark Can't Use Patents, Trademarks Or Copyright To Block Third Party Ink Cartridges https://t.co/nRablHoVw0 -> Irish music industry shares ‘safe harbour’ copyright concerns in Brussels https://t.co/dmXFyN0y4S -> Registration v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
The Court overturned Federal Circuit case law holding that post-sale restrictions and foreign sales preserve a U.S. patent-holder’s right to sue for infringement. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:45 pm
Even someone who later acquired a product, like the companies that refill printer cartridges, would have to abide by these restrictions…” [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
The Federal Circuit decision was taken for review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
The Federal Circuit decision was taken for review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:00 am
Supreme Court has ruled 7-1 against printer manufacturer Lexmark in its case against Impression Products, a company that sells refilled printer cartridges for Lexmark printers. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:31 pm
Prior to today, the answer under Federal Circuit precedent was yes: A could sue both B and C. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:30 pm
" These companies acquire Lexmark cartridges, then re-fill and re-sell them. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm
Lexmark did this to keep the cartridges out of the hands of companies like Impression Products, that refurbish, refill, and resell the cartridges at a discount and in direct competition with Lexmark. [read post]
30 May 2017, 11:38 am
Even someone who later acquired a product, like the companies that refill printer cartridges, would have to abide by these restrictions. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am
The Supreme Court is staying its course with respect to patent matters, regardless of some patent troll lobbying groups suggesting that all those decisions would result in the demise of the American inventor (quite the opposite is the case).Lexmark tried to leverage its patents on toner cartridges against various so-called remanufacturers (companies that buy up empty toner cartridges, refill them, and then sell the refilled cartridges). [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 5:26 am
Another product is designed to fill cartridges with medical cannabis for use in vape pens. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
For example, Lexmark gives customers an option to purchase their patented toner cartridges at full price, without restrictions, or at a discounted price, wherein the toner cartridges may be used only once and then must be returned to Lexmark. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:40 pm
The company first tried to argue that copyright law, and section 1201 of the DMCA (which prohibits circumvention of DRM), gave it the right to prevent re-use of its toner cartridges. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Being an international company (it is, after all, part of its name), Lexmark sells printers and toner cartridges around the world. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Being an international company (it is, after all, part of its name), Lexmark sells printers and toner cartridges around the world. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Being an international company (it is, after all, part of its name), Lexmark sells printers and toner cartridges around the world. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am
Lexmark International, Inc., a case that tests the scope of the patent-exhaustion doctrine, noting that if “printer maker Lexmark International prevails against ink cartridge reseller Impression Products, tech giants and other American companies will gain the ability to control products through patent claims after they have been sold. [read post]
