Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 10:00 am by Patrick McKinney
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania: Does a proceeding before the United States Department of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals constitute a “suit” such as to trigger insurance coverage under a commercial general liability policy? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:33 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Ill, Filed Jan. 11, 2012 Insurance companies, self-insured employers, and union health and welfare plans filed the class action in Illinois Federal Court alleging several RICO violations against Walgreen Co. and Par Pharmaceutical Co. for engaging in a scheme to overcharge for generic versions of Zantac and Prozac. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Patrick E. Knie
Related Blog Posts: Impostor’s Fraud Does Not Vitiate South Carolina Medical Malpractice Insurance Coverage for Facility or Innocent Co-Insureds – Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Patrick E. Knie
Related Blog Posts: Impostor’s Fraud Does Not Vitiate South Carolina Medical Malpractice Insurance Coverage for Facility or Innocent Co-Insureds – Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Patrick E. Knie
Related Blog Posts: Impostor’s Fraud Does Not Vitiate South Carolina Medical Malpractice Insurance Coverage for Facility or Innocent Co-Insureds – Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:22 am by Latosha M. Ellis and Yosef Itkin
These decisions show why the development of state law continues to matter even though the state pleading standard is lower than the federal pleading standard. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 11:53 am by Evan Schwartz
As part of the settlement agreements, United agreed to cease the violations, improve its disclosures to plan participants and commit to compliance with federal and state laws going forward. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:33 am
On October 17, 2007, a federal court judge sitting in the Eastern District of Louisiana dismissed a Katrina-related whistleblower lawsuit (United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by Jeremy Tyler
While the standards for expert witness testimony may differ between state and federal courts, all federal courts are bound by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. [read post]