Search for: "Fields v. Arizona, State of et al"
Results 61 - 77
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
Title: Fields v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Several people who were on the trail on the day of the field application, including at least five members of the Decorah High School cross country team, later told a state investigator that they had been sprayed multiple times by a helicopter flying overhead near the field. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
State of Arizona et al; Case No. 10-cv-1413 in U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
In the honest services cases, Skilling et al., the Court saved a statute of dubious constitutionality by giving it a restrained interpretation. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Click Here Beef slaughterhouse in Wash. state to pay $750,000. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
Flores, No. 08-294 (consolidated with Arizona State Speaker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
In a study of E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks from 1982-2002, the authors estimated that half of the produce-associated outbreaks were due to produce already contaminated with E. coli O157 before purchase by the retail store or consumer (Rangel et al, 2005). [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:47 pm
Schmechel, et al., Beyond the Ken? [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
