Search for: "Fields v. Housing Authority" Results 61 - 80 of 1,461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:57 am
 When she came back, she sold the house to Firstenberg and moved into a house Leith owned that was “next door to” Firstenberg’s house. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide whether federal banking officials have  sole authority to probe whether national banks discriminate against minorities in making home loans, thus excluding any state regulation  in that field. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
  Further, four members of the House of Lords in OBG Ltd v Allen had emphasized the need to confine the tort within careful limits. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
We affirm the denial of Malloy‘s motion to suppress under the authority of Davis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm by Ryan Scoville
This plan didn’t work, but the authorities found out about it and prosecuted Ms. [read post]