Search for: "First Security Nat. Bank v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
  The first such ground is “for cause, including lack of adequate protection” of the secured creditor’s lien or security interest in the project and/or the rents generated therefrom. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
United States Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 479 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2007), where the Ninth Circuit applied the “legal certainty” standard, under which a defendant must prove with a “legal certainty” that CAFA’s jurisdictional amount is met. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Vopper, the self-interested bank in First Nat’l Bank of Boston v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
 However, Article 9 does not apply to the extent that a statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States preempts it. [read post]