Search for: "First USA Bank, N.A. "
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm
REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES OF COLOMBIA, (FARC), et al., Defendants, JOSE RICUARTE DIAZ HERRERA, Claimant-Appellant, WACHOVIA BANK, a Division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., Garnishees, MERCURIO INTERNATIONAL S.A., et al., Claimants. 11th Circuit. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 4:48 am
“The party seeking to invoke collateral estoppel has the burden to show the identity of the issues, while the party trying to avoid application of the doctrine must establish the lack of a full and fair opportunity to litigate” (Matter of Dunn, 24 NY3d 699, 704; see HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Pantel, 179 AD3d 650, 651). [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 5:22 am
“The party seeking to invoke collateral estoppel has the burden to show the identity of the issues, while the party trying to avoid application of the doctrine must establish the lack of a full and fair opportunity to litigate” (Matter of Dunn, 24 NY3d 699, 704 [2015]; see HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Pantel, 179 AD3d 650, 651 [2020]). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
TOPCIS: federal-preemption, MIDLAND-FUNDING-LLC, National-Bank-Act, predatory-lending-issue, usury – posted 12/12/17Rich Reister vs. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Bank, N.A. the court will decide two questions posed in the petition: “1. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
JP Morgan Chase Bank, 505 F. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:09 am
Chase Bank USA, N.A., 566 F.3d 883 (9th Cir. 2009) [Slip Opn., at 5996 ]. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:55 am
Under this principle, “[i]t is not necessary that the precise legal theories presented in the first action also be presented in the second action” (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Luxama, 172 AD3d 1341 [2d Dept 2019]), so long as both suits “aris[e] out of the same subject matter or series of alleged wrongs” (JFK Family Ltd. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Wachovia Bank N.A. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. 15-505Issue: (1) Whether a judgment that conclusively determines liability, sets forth the amount of a money judgment, and orders the sale of property is final under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:47 am
Chase Bank USA, N.A., another judge in the Southern District of New York considered the issue and concluded that service of a third party complaint by Facebook message and email to an address listed on an individual’s Facebook profile (in addition to service on the woman’s estranged mother) would not satisfy due process. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 1:35 am
Home Town Bank, N.A. (5th Cir.); Stein v Buccaneers LP (11th Cir.). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm
’” Read Judge Schack’s Twilight Zone case for yourself: HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Wachovia Bank, N.A. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Assuming the dispute between the lawfirm and the client is split into two parallel proceedings -- one in court, the other one the arbitral forum -- does it matter which one rules first on the voidness issue? [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Santander Consumer USA, Inc, appellants contend that because they were not collecting a debt for another, they were not debt collectors under the ACT. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
Bank, N.A., 17-1712 Issue: (1) Whether an ERISA plan participant or beneficiary may seek injunctive relief against fiduciary misconduct under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
Appeals -- Sanctions -- Maintenance of indefensible position in trial court and on appeal -- Rare circumstance in which appellee may be sanctioned -- Appellee complying with none of court deadlines -- Appellee directed to show cause why appellant's attorney's fees should not be assessed against appellee HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Appellant, vs. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Leach's subcontractors, Power Design, Inc. and Atlas Comfort Systems USA, LLC[3] (collectively, the Subcontractors); and (3) an engineering contractor, CHP & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc., and its employee Mark Janneck (collectively, the Engineers).[4] Sapphire, in turn, promptly amended its petition to name these parties as defendants, alleging that their negligence and contractual breaches resulted in construction defects that caused the condominium project to sustain the… [read post]
