Search for: "Fisher v. Major" Results 61 - 80 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 10:29 am
But the petition for rehearing clearly changed Judge Fisher's mind, since a couple of months ago, he withdrew his opinion, and today, Judge Noonan -- who was the author of the original dissent -- writes the majority opinion, which affirms the tax court. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm
"The Third Circuit's Judge Fisher would hold that the ministerial exception would apply to these facts, but to me, the majority opinion wins the battle fairly clearly.There might well be some judges on the Ninth Circuit who would see things the same way as Judge Fisher. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:53 pm
It's not a good sign for the viability of a majority opinion when you can't even get Judge Graber to agree that the civil rights claim alleged by the plaintiff is viable.I can see where Judge Fisher (joined by Judge Noonan) is coming from. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:53 am
It's not a good sign for the viability of a majority opinion when you can't even get Judge Graber to agree that the civil rights claim alleged by the plaintiff is viable.I can see where Judge Fisher (joined by Judge Noonan) is coming from. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:30 am
By Mike Dorf On October 10, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Kristina Araya
In Fisher Sand and Gravel Co v Neal A Sweebe, Inc, No. 297156, Judge Owens authored the majority opinion in this case of first impression, holding that the plaintiff’s claim for payment on an open account relating to the sale of goods was barred by the four year limitations period in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:44 am
 The question is whether the prosecutor improperly used a peremptory challenge to dismiss the only African-American in the juror pool.Judge Fisher writes the majority opinion. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:15 pm
Back in 2016, Judge O'Scannlain authored this opinion, and Judge Fisher's dissent summarized the relevant holding as follows:"When a sitting juror is alleged to have continuously texted a judge friend about the trial and relayed the judge’s information to the jury, the majority concludes the trial court need not investigate further – and the jury verdict would not violate due process. [read post]