Search for: "Fix v. Fix" Results 61 - 80 of 13,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 8:15 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Effective representation does not require briefing every conceivable issue, Jones v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Meredith Ervine
Last week, John shared a blog from Tulane Law prof Ann Lipton flagging a recent transaction where the parties contemplated a charter amendment in the merger agreement to fix the Con Ed clause enforceability issues highlighted by Chancellor McCormick’s recent decision in Crispo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:30 am by Meredith Ervine
At the beginning of the year, John blogged about a charter amendment contemplated in a merger agreement to fix the Con Ed clause enforceability issues highlighted by Chancellor McCormick’s latest decision in Crispo v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:30 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
”   These two articles, along with the recent New Hampshire Supreme Court decision in Baxter v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:15 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Katherine Sartain* If you are scoring at home, count Permico Royalties LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Leah Nicholls
In his column about the proposed amendment, Tribe writes that the rise of super PACs has less to do with the decision in Citizens United than the 1976 decision in Buckley v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:56 am by Ralph T. Wutscher
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) both recently issued proposed rules to “fix” the potential problems arising from the ruling in Madden v. [read post]