Search for: "Florida v. J. L"
Results 61 - 80
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
L. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:45 pm
L. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 8:54 am
Here are today's programs and speakers: Changing Families, Changing Law? [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:04 pm
Introduction In Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
IPSO – 10967-21 Extinction Rebellion v Daily Star, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation – 09796-21 Albany House Surgery v Worcester News, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
The next Data Protection Foundation Course is in London, and starts on the 9-11 May (3 days); full details available here. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
Connecticut 3.00% > $0 3.00% > $0 n.a. n.a. $15,000 $24,000 $0 (j, q, r, s) 5.00% > $10,000 5.00% > $20,000 5.50% > $50,000 5.50% > $100,000 6.00% > $100,000 6.00% > $200,000 6.50%… [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:10 am
L. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Katie Porter and Raúl Grijalva sent a letter to six public relations firms, asking for details on their work with energy companies and whether they had aided them in campaigns to obscure the link between fossil fuels and climate change. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
., Kimsey v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Wade and reaffirmed but revised it in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm
Papkin, J. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
The link for the meeting room is: https://hec-fr.zoom.us/j/97765828364, The Program follows below. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Right-to-carry laws and violent crime The most-cited study supporting New York's very restrictive law is John J. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm
J. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:34 am
L. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
article (see also this thread); recall that the key First Amendment arguments are in this post, which relies on the PruneYard, Turner, and Rumsfeld precedents, and in this one, which explains why Miami Herald, Hurley, and the various other "common theme" precedents don't apply. [* * *] [1.] [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
"[116] Turner and Rumsfeld rejected similar claims.[117] Even the district court opinion striking down the specific Florida social media access rules in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]