Search for: "Floyd v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 2:52 pm
Abandoning Miranda in Terrorism Cases Contrary to Constitution and Beginning of Slippery Slope towards Neo-Con Police State By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair The United States Supreme Court in 1966 handed down Miranda v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:46 am
Indefinite Detention: Preemptive Punishment for Future Sex Crimes By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair On May 17, 2010 the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 11:15 am
Kentucky V. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:57 am
Floyd, No. 08-15590, 2011 WL 2162083 (11th Cir. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm
On September 8, 2011, the Second Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm
Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, in Schneyder v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:34 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Billy Long v. [read post]
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contract
10 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contractKito v Board of Educ. of William Floyd School Dist., 2008 NY Slip Op 08459, Decided on November 5, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentBernard J. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:51 am
In Newby v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:53 am
Wilson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:21 pm
The United States Supreme in 1984 handed down Strickland v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm
Eddie’s Truck Center, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:33 am
The above issue, among several others, arose recently in the case of Teva v Merck, a judgment of Mr Justice Floyd from last week and available from BAILII here. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
That is the question raised by last month’s decision from Mr Justice Floyd in Omnipharm Ltd v Merial [2011] EWHC 3393 (Pat). [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
Our piece examined a November 2011 decision by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Morales v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 11:07 am
Rule 702 Expert Testimony v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Had Hallen been cited at first instance, Sir Christopher Floyd considered that the trial judge may well have reached a different conclusion. [read post]
