Search for: "Force v. Facebook, Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2022, 10:38 am by Eric Goldman
If the law requires services to do anything more than this token response, it should be clearly unconstitutional. * Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Florian Mueller
Zuckerberg can afford--but I do care about Facebook's ability to serve companies of all sizes, especially SMBs.On Thursday, Snap Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
” (If you’re curious, the court opinion displays the memes at issue) * Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J heard an application in the case of Ince Group v Persons Unknown On 27 April 2022 Nicklin J heard a mode of trial application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The barrister who acted for Andrew Griffith, the disgraced former MP who was found guilty of raping his wife and unsuccessfully attempted to retain anonymity throughout the family court proceedings (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882), has been forced to apologise for potentially breaching court rules and section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960, which forbids publication of details of any case involving children heard in private, when he disclosed his… [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The Committee found that AI tools are commonly developed without oversight, most notably by police forces. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm by Christopher J. Hubbert
BlockFi Lending LLC (BlockFi) is a New Jersey-based financial services company owned by BlockFi, Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 18 February 2022, judgement was given in favour of the claimants in the defamation claim Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
While the district court did not force her to continue to work for JLM, the Second Circuit said the district court acted within its discretion in deciding that Gutman nevertheless could not compete with JLM. [read post]