Search for: "Ford Motor Warranty Cases" Results 61 - 80 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Jeffrey M. Reiff
Recently NHTSA has asked General Motors and the Ford Motor Company, as well as Toyota, to reveal data from comparable vehicles including but not limited to the 1993-2004 Chevrolet Blazer, 1993-2004 Ford Explorer, and 1993-2004 Toyota Forerunners. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
In what may be another case of first impression, the court held that the Graves Amendment does not apply to a "loaner" vehicle.While driving her 1998 Ford, plaintiff Haya Zizersky was involved in a collision with Symantha Mitchell, who was driving a 2008 BMW owned by either BMW of North America, LLC or BMW Financial Services NA, LLC. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:12 pm
For example, when there were issues with tread separation on SUV tires in the early 2000s, both the Ford Motor Company and Firestone faced legal action. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:44 am by Matt Norris
University Ford, Inc., the Plaintiff sued University Ford following her attempt to buy a 2010 Mustang. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:44 am by Matt Norris
University Ford, Inc., the Plaintiff sued University Ford following her attempt to buy a 2010 Mustang. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:09 am by Brian A. Comer
Ford Motor Co., 390 S.C. 203, 701 S.E.2d 5 (2010) in which it held that the risk-utility test was the exclusive test in a design defect case and required proof of feasible alternative design. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:17 pm
OEMs (original equipment manufacturers like General Motors, Ford and Chrysler) have filed. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 3:42 pm by Howard Gutman
The post Common Used Car Fraud Schemes first appeared on Lemon Law Cases. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Ohio 2009) warranty; privityIn re Ford Motor Co. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:44 pm
Which wouldn't necessarily be the case with salt and pepper shakers or stereo equipment. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 12:16 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Ford Motor Company The post South Carolina Plant Employee Was “User” of Product for Sodium Bromate for Purposes of Strict Product Liability Analysis – Lawing v. [read post]