Search for: "Foreign International Surveillance Court" Results 61 - 80 of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The centerpiece of the release is a lengthy April 26, 2017 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) memorandum order and opinion approving the new and amended targeting and minimization procedures. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 10:15 am
” Likewise, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) has made clear that the NSA is searching the full text of every communication flowing through the surveillance devices installed on certain international backbone links. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:27 am by Tim Edgar
E.O. 12,333 governs activities that are not regulated by statute and do not require a court order. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 12:27 pm
The court was created by the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:57 pm
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Appeals released a redacted version of its ruling from August 2008 upholding the constitutionality of a statute authorizing an intelligence program to wiretap international phone calls and intercept e-mail messages without a specific court order. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:53 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 The certification — approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and included among a set of documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden — lists 193 countries that would be of valid interest for U.S. intelligence. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:16 pm by David Ruiz
It robs Congress of the ability to accurately debate a practice whose detractors even include the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC)—the judicial body that reviews and approves Section 702 surveillance. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Caitlin Fennessy
Separately, in line with the court’s ruling, the European Commission assessed protections concerning both compelled access and direct surveillance in its recent draft U.K. adequacy determination, though it limited its assessment of direct surveillance to that with a “British Islands connection. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 12:52 pm by Susan Hennessey
Intelligence Community have relied on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to conduct surveillance on specific foreign targets located outside the United States to acquire critical intelligence on issues ranging from international terrorism to cybersecurity. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 6:00 pm by Megan Geuss
Some of the efforts involve using a proxy telecommunications company to manage the information gathered by local telecom companies in foreign countries, creating internal corporate cells with access to foreign-owned fiber optic cables, and using unchallenged rulings from Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts (FISC) to broaden the NSA's powers. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Peter Margulies
  Surveillance methods have to be approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC); persons targeted include those working with international terrorists, such as ISIS, international nuclear weapons dealers, and individuals evading sanctions that the US and global bodies have imposed on terrorists. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 6:15 pm by David Ruiz
But the court found that the real-world implementation of the UK’s surveillance—with secret hearings, vague legal safeguards, and broadening reach—did not meet international human rights standards. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:46 pm by David Greene and Katitza Rodriguez
Some of the conclusions are as follows: The NSA surveillance lacks “legality” in that NSA surveillance laws are largely governed by a body of secret law developed by a secret court, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), which selectively publishes its legal interpretations of the law;    The NSA surveillance is neither “necessary,” nor “proportionate,” in that the… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:13 am by April Glaser
Obama’s proposals fall silent on the need for increased transparency of the FISA Court, the secret court that’s been making secret interpretations of the law to enable U.S. global surveillance. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm by Axel Arnbak
If you make such assumptions, FISA doesn’t require consultation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for specific intelligence operations. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 5:22 pm by India McKinney
It also included important transparency provisions aimed at preventing future surveillance abuses, which are often premised on dubious and one-sided legal arguments made by the intelligence community and adopted by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC)—the federal court charged with overseeing much of the government’s foreign intelligence surveillance. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 11:17 am
"The officials said the new approach was based on evolving legal interpretations of the foreign surveillance law by the Justice Department, changes in the foreign surveillance statute in recent years and precedents set by the FISA court in approving specific requests to conduct electronic monitoring. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Background of the Case and the Supreme Court’s Reasoning In 1978, Congress passed the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act (FISA) to allow and to regulate certain electronic surveillance activities conducted by the federal government to gather foreign intelligence. [read post]