Search for: "Foster v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 61 - 76 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/bzlq2iE9Tw -> Court Sides With Dish Over ABC in DVR Fight http://t.co/eJjx0XOLah -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-09-18: Digital media, copyright and the law – Moneyweb v Fin24 http… http://t.co/kCYbHaUnDI -> MPAA Says Google Fosters Piracy http://t.co/0ZCRlxmDvh -> Don't Forget to Raise Equitable Arguments in Software Audits http://t.co/RCGOgXKqyW -> What Is More Important: Our Privacy or National Security? [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Court of Appeals Paternity - Defense of Equitable Estoppel - Applied to Deny Non-Biological Father Right to Deny Paternity In Commissioner of Social Services on Behalf of Elizabeth S. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/VHJMLy (Mikki Tomlinson) Reports and ResourcesCanadian eDiscovery Case Law Digests – Common Law -  http://bit.ly/UEJMX6 (Peg Duncan) Disclosure and Discovery in Utah – http://bit.ly/Uy1vzC (Utah Courts) Ethics of Twitter Research: Topology of Disciplines, Methods and Ethics Review Boards – http://bit.ly/UzhU6Y (Nick Proferes, Michael Zimmer) November Edition of Notable Cases and Events in #eDiscovery (PDF) http://bit.ly/RTr5Sl (Sidley Austin) Randoms vs… [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:51 pm by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
Very recently, the Supreme Court of Canada reiterated that the underlying values of dignity, integrity and autonomy are fostered by protecting a biographical core of personal information from the state (R. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
We have flagged up copyright concerns about the new social networking and content sharing site Pinterest in a previous round up. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court of Appeals held that that the irrebuttable presumption mandating that an indigent, non-custodial parent be ordered to pay a minimum of $25 per month in child support contravened the Federal Child Support Enforcement Act Social Security Act, Title IV-D §467(b)(2), as amended, 42 USCA §667(b)(2), thus violating the constitutional principle of Federal preemption. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
(Securing Innovation) Why blog about intellectual property? [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Commissioner of Social Security    Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0312p.06 2008/08/22 Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
The site played a pivotal role in fostering a grassroots movement against U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 648 Clarkson, WA 99403 Phone: (800) 758-1123 State Developmental Disabilities Program Division of Developmental Disabilities Department of Social & Health Services P.O. [read post]