Search for: "Fox v. FCC" Results 61 - 80 of 445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 4:33 pm by Zosha Millman
Fox Rothschild’s Jody Simon writing out of Los Angeles on their Pay or Play Blog March Monitoring Madness and Monitoring Methods – Minneapolis lawyer V. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:55 pm by Kevin
The only Scalia quips that seem to have made it into a post were two he made during FCC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Fox Television Stations, Inc., and, more recently, the High Court’s March 2015 holding in Perez v Mortgage Bankers Assoc. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Says https://t.co/DIYhCwB1uY -> Microsoft provides info about Canadian stored in cloud to US authorities R v Cusick, 2015 ONSC 6739 https://t.co/9jWyqqlVRt -> Federal Circuit Bites Back against USITC Expansion into Electronic Importation https://t.co/bST5rqAidp -> Bankers say cyber security and disruption by new technologies top list of emerging risks https://t.co/61NQBJxLzz -> Is the risk of copyright infringement worth the reward? [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:35 am
 Seriously, after National Review‘s Rich Lowry suggested on Fox News that Carly Fiorina emasculated Trump in the last primary debate, Trump said Lowry should not be allowed on air and should be fined by the FCC. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:46 am
The FCC’s “indecency” rules are notoriously vague (though they were upheld against a First Amendment challenged by a 5-4 vote in FCC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Fox Television Stations, Inc., and, more recently, the High Court’s holding earlier this month in Perez v Mortgage Bankers Assoc. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Turning to ABC’s assertion that the final rule is arbitrary and capricious, the court first rejected the argument that the revised regulations were subject to heightened review under the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in FCC v Fox Television Stations, Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm by Joy Waltemath
Turning to ABC’s assertion that the final rule is arbitrary and capricious, the court first rejected the argument that the revised regulations were subject to heightened review under the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in FCC v Fox Television Stations, Inc. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
A comment on Cartier v BSkyB http://t.co/Iax2rJKr9v -> Impending Lapse of PIPA Creates Uncertainty http://t.co/2uNTiVOPce -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-10-17: Rob Ford's medical records accessed by 2 unauthorized hospit… http://t.co/Dwff5VNmbJ -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-10-17 http://t.co/lBTXeVU1yR -> [read post]