Search for: "Francis v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2014, 10:42 am by Old Fox
 Looking Backward describes the future United States as a regimented worker’s paradise where everyone has equal incomes, and men are drafted into the country’s “industrial army” at the age of 21, serving in the jobs assigned them by the state. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
Heller, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects “the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:50 am
The United States also rejects the Trust's reading of United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Justice Myers in Sabey v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Francis Cissna, will dramatically change the way that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) adjudicates H-1B petitions for Information Technology companies. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Citing a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Francis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Francis Bellamy The first flag salute statute [requiring children in public schools to recite the Pledge of Allegiance] was passed in New York in 1898, the day after the United States declared war on Spain. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 2:07 pm
[www.josemedellin.info]No. 08-_____===============================================================IN THESupreme Court of the United States--------------------------------- . [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]