Search for: "Frank Shields"
Results 61 - 80
of 485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2022, 6:09 am
The attorney-client privilege is important primarily so that legal representatives can offer frank, accurate advice on relevant subject matter to their clients. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal Bipartisan Bill Aims to Curb Foreign Influence in U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:46 pm
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware law and writing about it in various publications for over 30 years. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:47 am
(quoting Frank, 951 F.2d at 322). [read post]
31 May 2022, 3:18 pm
Contributing as counsel were Devan Patel of AUF, and Theodore Frank, Anna St. [read post]
21 May 2022, 9:49 am
After sanctions from both Canada and the US, Frank sold his shares in both companies in an attempt to shield them from direct sanctions. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:50 pm
Frank Legal Services Organization at Yale Law SchoolMobilization for JusticeThe National Association of Consumer AdvocatesThe National Consumer Law CenterNew Economy ProjectPublic JusticeS. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 7:10 am
Some people even get so clever (by half) that they put their money in a trust thinking that the trust will shield the assets from division in divorce court. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
District Court Judge David Carter’s ruling came as he ordered the release to a House select committee of 101 emails from Trump ally John Eastman, rejecting Eastman’s effort to shield them via attorney-client privilege. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:13 pm
As the court recognized, counsel needs to be able to receive frank assessments of their cases to assess whether to bring a matter. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The 1980 report which created the foundation for FIPPA, the “Public Government for Private People: The Report of the Commission on Freedom of Information and Individual Privacy” (also known as the Williams Commission), explained the reasons for this as follows, If Cabinet discussions were to become a matter of public record, individual ministers would be inhibited from expressing their frank opinions for fear of later being identified as dissidents. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 12:26 pm
At a time when my people are threatened with extermination, when the support of the League may ward off the final blow, may I be allowed to speak with complete frankness, without reticence, in all directness such as is demanded by the rule of equality as between all States Members of the League? [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Plaintiff argues: Protective orders can be used to shield the identity of a party or witness when there is a risk of embarrassment or retaliation. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
On Jan. 31 and Feb. 5, The Washington Post reported that former President Trump routinely “tore up briefings and schedules, articles and letters, memos both sensitive and mundane” in violation of the Presidential Records Act (PRA) and that some of the records received by the Jan. 6 committee had been “ripped up and then taped back together. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm
This is the latest entry in my lengthy archive of writing, talks, and interviews about the EARN IT Act: Blog posts at the CIS blog: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6, part 7, part 8 Articles for Brookings TechStream: part 1, part 2 Talks at the DEFCON Crypto & Privacy Village and the University of Waterloo Interviews on the Decipher Security Podcast and ExpressVPN blog On January 31, Senator Richard Blumenthal, together with 18 co-sponsors from both parties, reintroduced the EARN IT… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:20 am
Just ask Frank Serpico how that can happen. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:24 am
There are the ones who use their shields to trade sex for a break. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
Don’t look now, but the law of executive privilege has undergone a substantial shift. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 6:27 am
When you have your own lawyer, you can use them as a shield to protect yourself from unwanted communications they’re better able to handle. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
A no-name plaintiff is shielded by anonymity, and can accuse the defendant of misconduct "without shame or liability. [read post]
