Search for: "Franklin v. Davis" Results 61 - 80 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Davis, No. 07-1964 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although a vehicular safety statute involving dangling ornaments that police relied upon to make the stop at issue was unconstitutionally vague; 2) nevertheless, the exclusionary rule did not apply as police were relying in good faith on a presumptively valid statute. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Jeff Davis County Includes the city of Hazlehurst. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm by Steve Bainbridge
4) The Rosenbergs (19)--good3) Franklin Delano Roosevelt (21)--give him some credit for managing the winning coalition in WW II2) Barack Obama (23)--way too high, even if socialized medicine ends up being his legacy1) Jimmy Carter (25)-- being feckless and sanctimonious doesn't make him a bad guyAll in all, I have to agree with Jim Geraghty that:I’m no fan of most of the Democrats on the list, and there are some good picks. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:42 pm
Goal V To achieve the highest standards of professionalism, competence and ethical conduct. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a working paper, Mason Marks, professor at University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law, and I. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Ronald M. Levin
President Franklin Roosevelt appointed this committee, staffed by luminaries who included professors Walter Gellhorn and Kenneth Culp Davis, for the very purpose of building a record for Congress to consider as it drafted administrative procedure legislation. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
Gary Davis from Ireland, perhaps a tad controversially for a data protection deputy commissioner, noted that there seemed to be emerging agreement on trading personal data for free web 2.0 services, but the question was, how much data was too much data; and Bruce Schneier (no link needed!) [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]