Search for: "Free Speech"
Results 61 - 80
of 37,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2024, 10:33 am
It is undisputed that Plaintiffs provide services free of cost, and it is difficult to categorize solicitations as "proposed transactions" when the target audience is not charged. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am
The swing away from Reed, which less than ten years ago was a major innovation that seemed highly deregulatory, is another example of how the weight of Trump-appointed judges is quickly changing the "conservative" approach to First Amendment free speech doctrine in ways that create divisions among conservatives, as even this relatively unimportant issue demonstrates. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:51 am
., Jonathan Adler's "A Frightening View of Free Speech and Academic Freedom at Harvard. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:04 am
Bobo's op-ed has incited me, an external actor, to publicly lament the subset of Harvard leaders who neither understand nor support free speech. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:45 am
Despite being denied visits to China, U.N. special rapporteurs on free speech, education, assembly and association, human rights defenders, judges and lawyers, and countering terrorism published a detailed analysis in March of the Chinese government’s “Safeguarding National Security Ordinance” imposed on Hong Kong. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
.' The point is that the bar association also has a duty to protect the core rights that define our legal system, particularly the right of free speech. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Williams, Conversion Therapy on LGBTQ+ Children as a Form of Torture and the Rights of the Child in the Face of the United States Constitution’s Free Speech and Religious Free Exercise Clauses, 26 Journal of Gender, Race & Justice 393 (2023). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
He is the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage” (Simon and Schuster, 2024). [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
Azerbaijan On 13 June 2024, the ECtHR held that here had been an infringement on the Article 10 free expression rights in the case of RFE/RL Inc. and others v Azerbaijan (Application no. 56138/18). [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:05 am
“A Win for Trump — and Free Speech — at the Supreme Court; The justices resolved a trademark dispute over ‘Trump too small’ shirts by saying peddle whatever you want, just don’t piggyback on someone else’s fame”: Law professor Stephen L. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Bobo's op-ed has incited me, an external actor, to publicly lament the subset of Harvard leaders who neither understand nor support free speech. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 5:45 am
One way to act as if the polls are right is to assert that they are wrong.Speaking of Trump appealing to black people, here's "Trump portrays rampant crime in speech at Black church in Detroit /The presumptive Republican nominee, who hopes to dent Biden’s advantage among Black voters, has often disparaged communities where many African Americans live" (WaPo)(free access link):The Biden campaign accused Trump of pandering and empty promises, emphasizing his… [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 5:06 am
“Free speech wins again! [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
In the course of applying broadly worded text like the Free Speech Clause, courts must inevitably articulate principles to resolve individual cases. . . . [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 7:58 pm
The chronological links provided are to the primary sources, and as available, indicate links to alternate free versions. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 4:39 am
To be clear, free speech includes criticism. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
For all his grim recounting of the assaults on free speech, his is ultimately a buoyant book. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
King was assassinated on April 4, the day after delivering his “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” speech, in which he praised Lawson. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
” Elster appealed, asserting that this statute infringed his First Amendment right to free speech. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:54 pm
The Court finds that Congress did not give clear statutory authorization to this agency....This Court finds the Final Rule violates the Spending Clause because it contains ambiguous conditions and because the Final Rule violates other constitutional provisions – free speech and free exercise. [read post]
