Search for: "Freedom Fund Holdings"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 4:55 am
The proposal, purportedly aimed at addressing misinformation, calls for more government funding for the media and that the government explore options to “hold on-line information services accountable for the veracity of material published on their platforms and to limit publication only to material whose sources can be traced. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 11:30 pm
Would disclosure cause sufficient prejudice to QM's research programmes, reputation and funding streams to refuse disclosure? [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Throughout the 1900s, more than 150,000 Aboriginal children were forced to attend Indian residential schools, a network of compulsory boarding schools funded by the Canadian government and administered by Christian churches. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:52 am
Federal Election Commission holding. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm
We’re asking the court to hold fast to core principles that have long been decided. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:27 am
In both hearings I advocated a combination of corporate responsibility through the Global Network Initiative backed up by appropriate legislation given that some companies seem reluctant to hold themselves accountable voluntarily; revision of export controls and sanctions; and finally, funding and support for tools, and technologies and activism platforms that will counter-act suppression of online speech. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:47 pm
They fund litigation litigation in defence of s. 2(b) Charter rights. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:34 am
"Stallman proposes that we "reject ebooks that deny our freedom. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:26 pm
Tomorrow the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing that will finally give voice to trafficking victims. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
Whatever the freedom they would have under Texas law, that freedom is blocked by the ICE Hold and they are kept in custody by the state authorities at the federal government’s request. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 11:42 am
The majority rejected the Department’s argument that the no-aid provision actually promotes religious freedom by ensuring that taxes are not directed to religious organizations, and it safeguards the freedom of religious organizations by keeping the government out of their operations. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
Cheeky: “Stupid Is As Stupid Does – Tax Protesters And The Cheek Defense” (Peter Reilly) Two Big Macs and a side of sticks: “Beavers holding legal defense fund-raiser at a McDonald’s“ [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:55 am
Given the increased freedom for advertising under the JOBS Act, the SEC may look more closely at advisers taking advantage of the foreign private adviser exemption and whether any activities [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:28 am
In the present case, the Tribunal added, these interests are further underlined by the fact that the research was supported by public funds. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:12 pm
We will hold a hearing on this . . . [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:05 am
In In re Referendum on the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009, (DCBOEE, Feb. 4, 2010), the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics rejected an attempt to hold a referendum on recently passed DC legislation authorizing same-sex marriage. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
The crosses – about thirteen in all – are paid for with private funds, but most sit on public property. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
In Freedom From Religion Foundation v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:45 am
CNS News reports that on Friday the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously adopted a compromise resolution on freedom of opinion and expression that had been proposed by the United States and Egypt. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
State Policy v New York City Police Pension Fund (88 AD3d 520 [1st Dept 2011]), motion for leave to appeal dismissed, 18 NY3d 901 [2012]).** Accordingly, said the First Department, “we adhere to our prior holding under the principle of stare decisis,*** which applies with particular force to issues of statutory interpretation. [read post]
