Search for: "Freeman's Estate, Matter of"
Results 61 - 80
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, Matter of Freeman and Matter of Berkman. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, Matter of Freeman and Matter of Berkman. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, Matter of Freeman and Matter of Berkman. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, Matter of Freeman and Matter of Berkman. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, Matter of Freeman and Matter of Berkman. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm
Anthony 2003 Link The Law of Sentencing Manson, Allan 2001 Link The Law of Torts, Fourth Edition Osborne, Philip H. 2011 Link The Law of Torts, Third Edition Osborne, Philip H. 2007 Link The Law of Torts, Second Edition Osborne, Philip 2003 Link The Law of Trusts, Second Edition Gillese, Eileen E. 2005 Link The Law School Book: Succeeding at Law School, Third Edition Hutchinson, Allan C. 2009 Link The Law School Book: Succeeding at Law School, Second Edition Hutchinson, Allan C. 2000 Link Law… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:06 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:05 am
For 2013, the court decided 34 civil cases (not including attorney discipline and juvenile matters). [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:34 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:35 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:36 pm
Based upon the criteria established by Matter of Freeman and Matter of Potts as applied to guardian’s ad litem, the court awards the guardian ad litem the fee of $9,000.00. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 4:06 am
His practice covers a wide range of matters within the areas of real estate litigation, commercial and banking litigation, and probate litigation, including representing private property owners and business owners in eminent domain matters. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 4:06 am
His practice covers a wide range of matters within the areas of real estate litigation, commercial and banking litigation, and probate litigation, including representing private property owners and business owners in eminent domain matters. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:28 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman . [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm
Freeman v. [read post]
