Search for: "French v. United States Government"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
The disaster drew the first class action lawsuit against the United States government on behalf of 8,485 plaintiffs, under the recently enacted 1946 Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
David McKnight's influential treatise observed that "[i]t is obvious that . . . the President is not regarded as 'an officer of, or under, the United States,' but as one branch of 'the Government.'" In Mississippi v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
United States v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
The United States undoubtedly has robust public policy favoring free expression. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:38 am
Moreover, even if the current oath were constitutional, the government of the United States has rendered Plaintiff, on the basis of her sincerely held religious beliefs, unable to take the oath that all others take. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:12 am
”) State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
PPD-28 is binding on the executive branch, however, and codifies the long-standing historical policy of the United States to collect intelligence in order to allow the government to make decisions concerning “foreign, defense and economic policy, and the protection of United States national interests from foreign security threats,” while drawing the line at aiding private corporations. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:50 pm
Diehl, and Alexandru Balas Sumudu Atapattu, reviewing International Environmental Law and Governance, edited by Malgosia Fitzmaurice and Duncan French [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:15 pm
The company does, however, offer ADRs in the United States. [read post]
