Search for: "Friedman v. District Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 783
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1] On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2] The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:58 am
On March 11, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:06 am
District Judge Nelson S. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
District Judge Bernard Friedman dismisses a complaint (or as he describes it, “a 136-page pile of papers”) on the grounds that it is “incomprehensible and serves no conceivable, legitimate legal purpose. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 1:05 pm
The court noted that it had upheld a similar ordinance in 2015 in the case of Friedman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
District Court on a Complaint for Provisional Arrest with a View Toward Extradition and ordered to be detained. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
District Court on a Complaint for Provisional Arrest with a View Toward Extradition and ordered to be detained. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
In the 1991 case of Friedman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
In the 1991 case of Friedman v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Alcedo v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm
Friedman defends individuals with charges in the New Jersey Superior Court, all New Jersey municipal courts, the New York State criminal courts in Brooklyn and Manhattan, and the federal district courts throughout New Jersey and New York City. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:48 am
Our Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 10:17 am
At least one federal court of appeals—the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Although the Court is not deciding today whether SPP can prevail on this claim, the Court concludes that SPP has included sufficient facts to provide notice to District 211 of a plausible claim under the IRFRA. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Although the Court is not deciding today whether SPP can prevail on this claim, the Court concludes that SPP has included sufficient facts to provide notice to District 211 of a plausible claim under the IRFRA. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
The key issue that has divided the district courts that have considered the issue so far is whether NAACP v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
Sullivan, Roe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:59 am
Friedman, 2019 U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:30 pm
., and Jonathan Waldrop of Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman, LLP will examine what's been happening at district courts since Berkheimer v HP Inc. and extract lessons for both plaintiffs and defendants. [read post]
