Search for: "Fuell v. US"
Results 61 - 80
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
V is for VANOC, the Vancouver Olympic Organizing Committee, which persuaded the federal government to pass special legislation that grants it unique powers to guard against unauthorized use of the Olympic marks. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 10:02 pm
In today’s case (Lotocky v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
Discussions covered a variety of aspects of content moderation, including artificial intelligence v human moderation, transparency and content removal policies and appeals. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
That was, of course, the story of the impeachment of President Trump bu the US House of Representatives. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:44 am
Little over four years later the House of Lords handed down the oft-cited and widely commented upon judgment in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘A’) holding that the power was incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:09 am
In 2024, the division bench comprising Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, delivered a significant judgment in the case of Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
(picture, right: the AmeriKat in the empty egg carton used in her morning's frittata). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm
OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code“) governs reorganisations in the US with Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases usually the most complex and costly forms of US bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 5:25 am
The use of drug informants surged. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
Richard Fentiman is Reader in Private International Law at the University of Cambridge, where he teaches the postgraduate course on International Commercial Litigation. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:33 pm
If you require assistance in regards to addressing these risks or have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please do not hesitate to contact us. [1] ‘Flexible work post-COVID’, Australian Government Workplace Gender Equality Agency (Web Page, 8 December 2021). [2] ‘Interim Report’, Senate Select Committee on Work and Care (Report, October 2022). [3] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 114(1) (‘FW Act’). [4] FW Act s 114(2)-(3). [5]… [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 3:08 am
It is ironic indeed that in the leading case of R. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
In this article the case of McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
Thish was evident in the Byrne v Minister for Finance case, where the Supreme Court eschewed any excessively literalist approach to the existing article 35.5, privileging the purpose and value of the literal rule. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
The fear is that this is vague enough to allow a future Government to abusively target judicial pay by also reducing the pay of a relatively minor or obscure comparator class – such that if say, the pay of hospital consultants were reduced, judicial pay could also be targeted, with this power potentially being used to pressurise the judges to make decisions favourable to Government policy. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment ZA Council v MT & Ors [2017] EWFC 12 (14 February 2017): An interesting example of extensive redaction This is the published judgment of a decision by Moor J sitting as a High Court Judge in the Family Court. [read post]
