Search for: "G. Warner" Results 61 - 80 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2012, 11:38 am by Ritika Singh
And I’m Margaret Warner, and I think most of you are veterans of this. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 12:00 pm
Posted by Duane Patterson The Los Angeles Times this morning has a large spread reporting on a private report coming to George W. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
This is the case despite  the fact that Swiss-type claims have been replaced by purpose-limited product claims under 54(5) of the EPC2000 and the Abbott ruling (G 0002/08 (Dosage regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY) of 19.2.2010). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:48 am by James Hamilton
Mike Johanns (R-NE), and Mark Warner (D-VA).A companion bill, Eliminate Privacy Notice Confusion Act, H.R. 749, passed the House by voice vote in March. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
”“The clothes on the hanger do nothing; the clothes on the woman do everything,” – Justice Stephen G. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 6:29 pm
Posted by Duane PattersonThe senior Senator from Virginia held a press conference earlier today to talk about his recent 2 day trip to Iraq with fellow Armed Services Committee member, Carl Levin. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 7:33 am by Erin Hawk
To read about our review, please click here: Labor & Employment - Ohio - Ranked 1 Chambers USA also ranked five of our Labor and Employment partners individually:   Bradd N Siegel - Labor & Employment Ohio Charles C Warner - Labor & Employment Ohio John M Stephen - Labor & Employment Ohio Fred G Pressley Jr - Labor & Employment Ohio Kevin Griffith - Labor & Employment Ohio    [read post]
Fig. 3: Plausibility reaches the UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd While Warner Lambert was a decision made in the context of a second medical use claim, this Case Law was soon also applied to product claims in the UK. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:35 pm
Time Warner's Turner Broadcasting and marketing firm Interference are to pay $2 million for a Cartoon Network ad campaign that caused a bomb scare in Boston last Wednesday. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Rose Hughes
Recently, the judge in Sandoz v BMS ([2023] EWCA Civ 472) interpreted G2/21 as being close to an ab initio plausibility standard in line with the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert. [read post]