Search for: "GLASS v. PAGE" Results 61 - 80 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am by Eric Goldman
If the conclusion to this post isn’t obvious after reading it, take off your plaintiff-colored glasses. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Katie Bart
The turning point may have been her 2013 dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
The following is the introduction to the Report’s cover page: “Just after the dawn of the Atomic Age and during the height of the Cold War, the United States conducted 67 nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands of the central Pacific. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm by Florian Mueller
The Clerk shall close the file.Judge Koh's underlying findings of fact and conclusions of law, however, span 233 pages (this post continues below the document):19-05-21 FTC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
” In particular, the court points to language in cases including Pittsburgh Plate & Glass Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
That is confirmed by LSO’s (back then, LSUC’s) “Final Report of the Sole Practitioner and Small Firm Task Force,” pages 50-54 (paragraphs 117-130), of March 24, 2005; (reviewed in Convocation, April 28, 2005). [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Gene Quinn
Kraft Food Group Brands LLC that reversed the Federal Circuit and said that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court’s 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Gene Quinn
Kraft Food Group Brands LLC that reversed the Federal Circuit and said that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court’s 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]