Search for: "GLOSSIP v. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2015, 10:50 am
Henderson, No. 14-6368, is a civil case on the use of allegedly excessive force against a pretrial detainee in jail.Wednesday, April 29: Glossip v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
One can expect that the smoldering embers of the Glossip debate will be quickly reignited. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court in Glossip v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:59 am
Dunn 16-602 Issues: (1) Whether, to satisfy his Glossip v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm
Breyer, who intends to retire this summer, has been an open critic of the death penalty, writing in dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:26 am
Supreme Court this morning rejected the claim of Russell Bucklew that his unusual medical condition required the state to execute him by the never-yet-used method of mitrogen hypoxia rather than the single-drug lethal injection method of a massive overdose of a barbiturate, the optimum widely-used method for most cases.Looking quickly over the opinion, it appears to be a strong reaffirmation of the decision four years ago in Glossip v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
Perhaps Justice Breyer will treat us to another magnum opus assuming every disputed allegation in favor of the anti-death-penalty side, as he did in Glossip v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
Monday the Supreme Court issued its opinions (yes, that's intentionally plural) in Glossip v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:45 pm
Making a death row inmate propose the method of execution, the product of the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Glossip v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:24 pm
” And in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
Louisiana and Roper v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:59 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes comments by Attorney General Eric Holder about Glossip v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 4:51 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost argues that if Richard Glossip, the named petitioner in Glossip v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 12:53 pm
In the ruling, the court clarified that the claimants did not meet the burden established by the Supreme Court in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:49 am
In addition to the questions presented in the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following Question: Whether petitioner met his burden under Glossip v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:29 am
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm
Dunn 16-602 Issues: (1) Whether, to satisfy his Glossip v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:11 pm
Would Glossip v. [read post]
