Search for: "GLOSSIP v. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
But many of us with an interest in criminal law are also following Glossip v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
This is the attitude that the Supreme Court denounced in the Glossip and Bucklew decisions. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:49 am
William Baude has this editorial in today's New York Times examining the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer in his recent powerful dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by Brian Stull
As Justice Stephen Breyer forecasted two terms ago in Glossip v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:50 am by Kent Scheidegger
Henderson, No. 14-6368, is a civil case on the use of allegedly excessive force against a pretrial detainee in jail.Wednesday, April 29:  Glossip v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Rory Little
  One can expect that the smoldering embers of the Glossip debate will be quickly reignited. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:59 am by Kate Howard
Dunn 16-602 Issues: (1) Whether, to satisfy his Glossip v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm by Ellena Erskine
Breyer, who intends to retire this summer, has been an open critic of the death penalty, writing in dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:44 am by Kent Scheidegger
Perhaps Justice Breyer will treat us to another magnum opus assuming every disputed allegation in favor of the anti-death-penalty side, as he did in Glossip v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:26 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court this morning rejected the claim of Russell Bucklew that his unusual medical condition required the state to execute him by the never-yet-used method of mitrogen hypoxia rather than the single-drug lethal injection method of a massive overdose of a barbiturate, the optimum widely-used method for most cases.Looking quickly over the opinion, it appears to be a strong reaffirmation of the decision four years ago in Glossip v. [read post]