Search for: "GOODE v. RUSSELL et al" Results 61 - 71 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined… [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(IPKat)   Portugal PGI status granted to Portuguese sweet potato Batata doce de Aljezur (Class 46)   Serbia Serbia ratifies Vienna Agreement on Figurative Elements of Marks (Class 46) Municipal Court of Nis issues three-month prison sentence and nominal fine to individual found to have infringed copyright in Sony PlayStation games (The IP Factor)   United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Stella’s NUDE gets the ‘go ahead’: Nude Brands Limited v… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:17 pm
DeWolff, Boberg & Assoc., Inc., et al. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 2:20 pm
” Arthur is a serious political activist who went to prison several times for his beliefs - Newbury / Stonehenge et al - and this is all documented on the website (above) and in his book. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 4:59 am
Bork and Posner et al) has not been kind to the good doctor, and the Court looks poised to apply the "rule of reason" to such arrangements. [read post]