Search for: "GRANT II v. BAKER III" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
(ii) it will ordinarily be irrelevant that the Claimant is legally aided. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:31 am by Russell Jackson
" The district court in Comer II also held that plaintiffs' claims were non-justiciable under the political question doctrine as established in Baker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:02 am by Francis Pileggi
  In the end the Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts II and III, and granted defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts V, VI, and VII. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
On January 24, 2007, the UST sent the Debtor's counsel a letter advising him of the Audit and attaching three documents (the "Audit Instructions"): (i) a document request and instructions on how and by when to produce the documents (the "Document Request"); (ii) a form to be completed by the Debtor's counsel informing the Auditor whether it is permitted to contact the Debtor directly; and (iii) a document entitled "Information on Debtor… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
(ii) When the prosecution for the offense has become barred by lapse of time according to the laws of the requesting State. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
On ii) [The] second submission is clearly wrong. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
Ct. 1937 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:15 pm by David Hart QC
(see a similar draft finding in another Committee decision (ACCC/C/2008/23), criticising a decision by the Court of Appeal in Morgan & Baker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
II If your issue is simply the substance of climate change policy, and not UN politics, then you perhaps don’t much care about these abstract issues of legitimacy, global governance, and the UN. [read post]
6 May 2009, 12:47 am
  Also included are the contents of the TRIG with the results of her own self-administered TRIG grief profile, including: (i) her thoughts as she considered each statement, (ii) her perceptions about what her overall scores mean, (iii) her reactions to taking it, (iv) why she rated each statement as she did, and (v) criticism of the scoring as an accurate portrayal of a grief response. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Verizon PA Inco o Court Grants Additional Compensation To Plaintiff To Offset Tax LiabilityEshelman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
Whether the Commission erred by denying Appellants' request to reopen the record; II. [read post]