Search for: "GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Oral Argument Preview: Some Post Schwartzwald Foreclosure Standing Stuff. Bank of America v. Kuchta.
30 Dec 2013, 7:03 am
Kuchta, et al., 2013-0304. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm
California Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:43 am
Montgomery et al., 2016-0790. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:18 am
" Data Retrieval Technology LLC et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
McCoy, et al., 09-329. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:08 am
Alexis Hunley et al v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:04 am
NRT Technology Corp. et al, 2-15-cv-00822 (NVD March 25, 2016, Order) (Du, J.) [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
Novartis Pharms. et al., No. 06-1181 (Fed. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:37 am
Birch Operations Inc. et al., the form of an instrument affecting real property in Texas does not affect the interest conveyed by the instrument. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:59 am
Land et al., Venture Global sought to condemn land in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, and a preliminary injunction for immediate possession of the property. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:08 am
LocatePlus Holdings, Corp. et al., C.A. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:21 am
Western Stone & Metal Corp. et al, 2-20-cv-01931 (CDCA 2020-08-14, Order) (Dolly M. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA et al. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 8:47 am
(David Post) Yesterday, a group of 34 law professors filed an amicus brief that I drafted in the 2d Circuit’s WNET et al v Aereo case. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:48 am
Offshore Specialty Fabricators Inc., et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:24 am
Texas Crude Energy, LLC et al is another chapter in the back-and-forth over deduction of post-production costs from royalty payments. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:40 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Google’s motion to dismiss The Authors Guild, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm
” This Court has previously expressed skepticism about that doctrine; Rosetta cannot rely on that concept to hold Google liable here. ______ The case library: * Public Citizen amicus brief in support of Google. * Public Knowledge/EFF amicus brief in support of Google. * eBay/Yahoo amicus brief in support of Google. * Google's opening response brief. * UK Intellectual Property Law Society amicus brief in support of neither party. * Rosetta Stone's opening appellate brief: redacted… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:31 pm
CSR, et. al (Fed. [read post]
