Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 61 - 80 of 3,818
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Perjury; subornation of perjury; conspiring to defeat the course of justice. 22. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
‘Ministry of Justice’ shall, for the United States of America, mean the United States Department of Justice; and for a Member State, its Ministry of Justice, except that with respect to a Member State in which functions described in Articles 3, 5, 6, 8 or 12 are carried out by its Prosecutor General, that body may be designated to carry out such function in lieu of the Ministry… [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Section 5 requires nine states and assorted jurisdictions in seven others to secure Justice Department approval before changing their voting laws. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Section 5 requires nine states and assorted jurisdictions in seven others to secure Justice Department approval before changing their voting laws. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Wells C. Bennett
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am by Matthew Pomy
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 7:32 am by Howard Friedman
As previously reported, after the Department of Justice dropped its appeal of the district court's decision in United States v. [read post]