Search for: "GROW v. GROW"
Results 61 - 80
of 11,629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am
Growing up in Baltimore in the Seventies (you can take the boy out of Baltimore but you can’t take the Orioles out of the boy – go Birds!) [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
But doesn’t elimination of tax deferrals necessarily leave less to invest and grow, thus undermining the goal of boosting private retirement savings? [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:09 am
Javier v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:09 am
Javier v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:55 am
Indeed, it is impossible to understand last Term’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
The increasing monitoring of international private and public art collections and the growing number of claims searching for the restitution of artworks made by Holocaust victims and their heirs have led to this issue gaining international attention. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:39 pm
But internal calls are growing for the police chief to step aside as University of California President Michael V. [read post]
3 May 2024, 11:22 am
Kaercher v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
app=desktop&v=P8YiZO3OGjk&ab_channel=BrianCarroll1306 Pivot Podcast – Future of Work: AI – https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/future-of-work-ai/id1073226719? [read post]
2 May 2024, 4:00 am
In Stephens v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:59 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:56 pm
[2] Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688. [read post]