Search for: "Gamble v. Daniel"
Results 61 - 80
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm
IPKat reader and enthusiast Carlton Daniel (Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (UK) LLP) was so excited about the nearly-recent decision in Office of Fair Trading v Purely Creative (Chancery Division, England and Wales) [2011] EWHC 106 (Ch) that he offered to write it up for us. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
Renters, Time magazine takes a look at the mobile home rent control issues behind the recent Ninth Circuit en banc opinion in Guggenheim v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
Avgiris, Comment, Huddle up: surveying the playing field on the single entity status of the National Football League in anticipation of American Needle v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
Daniel Ramsey, 2010 Ill. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:00 am
Procter & Gamble, No. 1:09-cv-815 (N.D. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 2:16 am
In Reit v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
Daniels, of Reeaxamination Alert and Practice Center Contributor which includes the requests for the weeks of August 16th and August 23rd…. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Filed August 5, 2010 by The Procter & Gamble Company. (5) 95/001,416 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Although Daniel W. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Altitude Nines, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm
Green, Director of Business Development & Marketing, Baker & Daniels Shari Harley, Owner, The Harley Group International M. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cal., Filed 2005): Freedom Wave has sued Mad Catz et al. for infringement of its six patents claiming various technologies for wireless game controllers with vibration.Home Gambling Network et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 11:22 am
Proctor & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP licensing in… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
France Paris Appeal Court: Che Guevara’s portrait: an icon, not a trade mark (Class 46) Germany German banks move towards deal on patent collateralisation (IAM) Munich Regional Court dismisses actor/comedian Michael ‘Bully’ Herbig’s trade mark and personality rights infringement case against Take Two Interactive over ‘Bully – Die Ehrenrunde’ computer game (Class 46) Polar bear Knut and the ‘big… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:47 am
Daniel Inouye06/19/2008
Fact Sheet: Senate Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal 2009, S.G.W. 210 (PDF 237 KB)Summary Prepared by the Senate Appropriations Committee06/19/2008
Fiscal 2009 Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Allocations - 302 (b)s (PDF 34KB)Proposal as Released by Senate Appropriations Chairman Robert Byrd on June 19, 200806/19/2008
Legislative Text of a Bill to Provide for a Comprehensive Study by the National Research Council of the National… [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz), US: Proposals for the approval of generic biologics under consideration: (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings), US: A paradigm shift in obviousness for pharma, biotech: (IP Law360), US: USPTO’s Bruce Kisliuk addresses ACI Pharma/biotech patent claim drafting and prosecution conference: (Patent Docs), US: New bill to provide biotech companies Sarbanes-Oxley relief: (California Biotech Law Blog), US: Biotech and pharma companies spent millions on lobbying in 2007: (Patent… [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:50 am
The opinion, P&G v. [read post]
