Search for: "Gamble v. The Examiner"
Results 61 - 80
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
, Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:23 am
[iv] Mitigation measures that focus on minimizing the impact by maximizing surge capacity may be seen from a declaration of a domestic “public health emergency”[v] or “a state of emergency. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:37 pm
Gamble to support this position. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
This paper will discuss whether there is a rationale for taxing nicotine products (beyond any inclusion in the general sales tax) and will examine how the excise taxes of these products could be designed in a more principled manner. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:47 pm
That said, Judge Grady’s “Order Concerning Format of Fee Petitions,” Cristancho v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
The research examined whether a lobbyist’s perception of their own success was accurate, compared to legislative outcomes, and if their measure of their own success was in line with other lobbyists who worked on the same issues. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Under State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:16 pm
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:51 am
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Lawyers for Judiciary Committee Democrats described McGahn as both “critical” and the “most important fact witness” before the lawsuit was filed, noting he witnessed key obstruction episodes examined by special counsel Robert Mueller. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
The first is that probably the four highest profile design cases in the UK in recent years (Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936, Dyson v Vax [2011] EWCA Civ 1206, Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, and PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12 (i.e. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
Justice Alito with opinion in Gamble v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
The decisionThe Board first noted that for a sign to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods and services in respect of which registration is sought as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish those goods and services from those of other undertakings (C-473/01 P, Procter & Gamble v OHIM). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:38 am
In particular, they examined how loot boxes are dealt with in a number of jurisdictions and considered the political, regulatory and legal environment. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
The war confirmed his deep belief that life is a gamble and there are no certainties; and by the same token it taught him to be extremely wary of ideological certainty. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:39 pm
Kavanaugh also focused on the extent that entrenched understandings such as stare decisis must be “wrong” to pursue change from them in Gamble v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Alabama and Gamble v. [read post]
