Search for: "Garbs v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:31 pm
Because the law varies from state to state, specialty pharmacies should consult with an attorney licensed in each state in which they operate to ensure compliance with applicable federal and state laws. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 8:44 am
The decision in Lockett v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:44 am
It cannot be a stock character such as a magician in standard magician garb. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:00 am
Illinois National Insurance Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:15 am
The latest civil rights assault comes in a new lawsuit filed in Texas by five states and several religiously affiliated health care organizations, Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:01 am
The court of appeals held in State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:01 am
The court of appeals held in State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Garbe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:30 am
This writer commends the government for its bold initiative, following its Australian cousins across the way.The Regulations were challenged in the High Court by all of the major tobacco companies (British American Tobacco (UK) Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary Of State For Health), where the companies, as summarized by Mr. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:48 pm
In its other case law, the Court has often applied Wednesbury review under the garb of proportionality. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
It cannot be a stock character such as a magician in standard magician garb. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
Id. at 46 (citing Toledo v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:32 am
The Oregon Supreme Court unanimously held this in yesterday’s State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:44 pm
” He stated that all headwear, religious or otherwise, was against the policy. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am
” And in The Atlantic, Eric Segall argues that the case is “a political challenge to the ACA dressed up in legal garb. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:40 am
See Leedy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
In this respect, the federalism principles at issue here are strikingly similar to those that arose in the Affordable Care Act case of King v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:30 am
The case of EEOC v. [read post]
