Search for: "Garcia v. Does"
Results 61 - 80
of 962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
Cordero-Garcia and Silva v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:20 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
In Ileto v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am
Does an operating agreement’s provision stating that “additional capital contribution may be made at such time and in such amounts as the Members shall determine” require unanimous consent of the LLC’s members, or does majority consent suffice? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:53 pm
Kogan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 3:45 pm
Kim, Yoorim Bang, & Eun Mee Kim, Women’s Empowerment Without Power: Strategic v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:14 pm
That does not necessarily control. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
The question we address is: does a grievance complaint filed with the assessor or board of assessment review at the administrative level by a net lessee who is contractually obligated to pay real estate taxes on the subject property satisfy RPTL 524 (3) such that the net lessee may properly commence an article 7 proceeding upon rejection of its grievance? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
The question we address is: does a grievance complaint filed with the assessor or board of assessment review at the administrative level by a net lessee who is contractually obligated to pay real estate taxes on the subject property satisfy RPTL 524 (3) such that the net lessee may properly commence an article 7 proceeding upon rejection of its grievance? [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:52 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Garcia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm
Oddly, MLB does not have embeddable YouTube videos for all these games. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am
That decision is First Solar, Inc. v. [read post]
