Search for: "Garcia v. Google, Inc."
Results 61 - 74
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
(a) Cooke & anr v MGN & anr (b) OPO v MLA & anr (c) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (d) PNM v Times Newspapers (16) Who was incorrectly described as a Deputy High Court judge in a judgment handed down this year? [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am
Finally: court expressed hope that the language was antiquated and the problem would never come up again.Craigslist v. 3Taps Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
On Tuesday 29 July 2014, there will be an application in the case of Hegglin v Google Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
Image Courtesy of Google Patents Streak Products v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
A current case that foreshadows this is the decision in Garcia v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
(a) Cooke & anr v MGN & anr (b) OPO v MLA & anr (c) Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (d) PNM v Times Newspapers (16) Who was incorrectly described as a Deputy High Court judge in a judgment handed down this year? [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am
Shutterfly, Inc., 2017 US Dist LEXIS 149604 (N.D. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Google announced an appeal in the 'Innocence of the Muslims' case where actress Cindy Lee Garcia had persuaded Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and a colleague in a split three-judge panel of U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that she held a copyright in her performance in a trailer for the controversial film, despite appearing for only five seconds - but with dissenting judge N. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 3:24 pm
The legal complexities of copyright enforcement on YouTube were highlighted in Garcia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED, No. 13-0573 (Tex. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm
In Garcia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
So… hey, banker-people-that-read-me… I know you’re there… Google analytics, remember… are you starting to notice anything changing for you guys of late? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 9:23 am
It’s interesting to contrast AWS’s actions here with Google’s in the Garcia case (where Google successfully resisted a court order requiring it to take down inflammatory content despite pleas to do so). [read post]
