Search for: "Garner v Garner"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 6:18 pm
No opinion garnered a majority. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:39 pm
This initiative has garnered enough signatures to secure a spot on the November 2024 ballot. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 9:02 am
Justin is co-lead plaintiff in a first-of-its-kind class-action lawsuit, Justin v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:57 pm
Garner. [read post]
US appeals court finds Florida Governor DeSantis violated First Amendment in firing local prosecutor
11 Jan 2024, 8:28 am
The court continued, “The First Amendment prevents DeSantis from identifying a reform prosecutor and then suspending him to garner political benefit. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts (2012). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 191 (2012). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:50 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Plaintiff ultimately failed to garner FINRA approval. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 7:11 pm
That would violate another longstanding rule of legal interpretation: the canon against superfluity, which, as Justice Scalia and Bryan Garner explain in Reading Law, requires courts to give effect to "every word and every provision" in a law and to ensure that "none should be needlessly given an interpretation that duplicates another provision" (quoting US v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:37 pm
The February 2023 case (Sharpe v Winterville Police Department) involved a motorist who was stopped by police. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Florida Virtual School v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
Plaintiff ultimately failed to garner FINRA approval. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm
Back in the old days, when you saw a complaint against a railroad, it was for the typical stuff: a railway worker got injured, someone got hit by the train, a cow trespassed on the tracks, etc.By contrast, nowadays, it's things like this one: a railway worker claiming that he got cancer from inhaling diesel exhaust, benzene, and the like.The trial court bounced this one because it didn't think the experts satisfied Daubert, but the Court of Appeal reverses and remands for a trial.It's… [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:54 am
Sheetz v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in 303 Creative v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
But I can summarize the key practical lesson that I garnered from the thing in a single sentence:Don't commit a cold-blooded murder in broad daylight with witnesses if you have a very distinctive neck tattoo.Otherwise they'll pretty much almost certainly catch you and throw you in prison for life.As here. [read post]
