Search for: "General Electric Co. v. United Technologies Corp."
Results 61 - 80
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
: (SpicyIP), Moving towards the nano age: (SpicyIP), YouTube (Google) and T-Series copyright dispute: (SpicyIP), (TechWhack), JapanIP Value in Japan - the alternative view: (IAM),South KoreaSouth Korea has been urged to strengthen its intellectual property rules in order to sign a free trade agreement with the European Union: (Intellectual Property Watch)The NetherlandsDutch teenager arrested, and another five questioned by police, for allegedly stealing virtual furniture from… [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
General Electric Co., 3 F.3d 329, 334 (9th Cir. 1993). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Meridian Medical Technologies (EPLAW) Monday miscellany: Schütz (UK) Limited v Werit UK Limited, Protechna SA; Superman’ logo drug dealer jailed (IPKat) Not the 2012 Olympics: Willie and Kate to wed (IPKat) UK government gets acid response from ACID (Class 99) United States US General USCC 2010 Report released (IP Dragon) USPTO issues performance and accountability report for Fiscal Year 2010 (TTABlog) US Patent Reform Patent Reform in the lame duck… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Electrosante; Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Electrosante; Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
Allen Eng'g Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
(The Solicitor General may be unconcerned about this. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
(IPBiz) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Despatch Industries – In PV furnace case green patent litigation moves upstream (Green Patent Blog) Heathcote Holdings Corp – False marking Plaintiff’s chosen form not given deference: Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron,… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]GlobalEvents in Bali heap further pressure on all IP owners: (IAM),Velcro defies generic claim in domain name battle: (OUT-LAW),ICANN forms group to hasten non-English domain names: (IP Justice)WTO members continue debate on geographical indications register: (Intellectual Property Watch),Creative Commons launches CCo and CC programs: (World IP Day),Green IP… [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 2011 WL 4708850 (D. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
See Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
