Search for: "General Motors Corp. v. Pennsylvania"
Results 61 - 80
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
P. 56(a); see also Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Labor relations -- Fair Labor Standards Act -- Overtime -- Motor carrier exemption -- Shuttle service that provides ground transportation services to general public traveling to and from local airports was entitled to summary judgment on former shuttle driver's claim for overtime under Fair Labor Standards Act on ground that airport shuttle van drivers fall under motor carrier exemption to FLSA… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
… It seemed better on all sides to work together,” city General Counsel Cindy Laquidara told board members as she explained the settlement proposal. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
The Court accepted the Solicitor General’s advice to hear the issue in Williamson v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:39 am
Relying on Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:41 am
(quoting Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
., a major motor vehicle engine company based in Columbus, Ind., will pay a $2.1 million penalty and recall 405 engines under a settlement agreement resolving violations of the Clean Air Act, the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Moreno, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:49 am
At that time, according to the defendant's own records, there were still sufficient funds remaining under the policy to pay this bill (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.15; Nyack Hosp. v General Motors Acceptance Corp., 8 NY3d 294). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
General Motors Corp., 2003 WL 168626, at *4 (N.D. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Corp., PICS Case No. 09-1884 (Pa. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
It has now been nearly five years since the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down its decision in the case of Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
General Motors Corp., 949 F. [read post]
