Search for: "George Davis v State" Results 61 - 80 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Chief Justice George:  What interpretation do you have of the State legislative history? [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
 Researching whether the persons responsible for Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment thought the president was an officer of the United States is a bit like researching whether George Washington had five fingers on his right hand. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Staci Zaretsky
Vincent de Paul School, State Judges, State Judges Are Clowns, Steven Davis, Steven H. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
Bank National Association v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
Sir David Davis MP has tabled a number of far reaching amendments [pdf] to the  Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill [pdf] which returns to the House of Commons for its Committee Stage on 8 May 2024. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]