Search for: "German v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,566
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
In this case, X v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2021] EWHC 355 (Fam)), the claimant demanded the recognition by the UK authorities of her child’s adoption in Nigeria. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am
Zöchling v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
United States and Schenck v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:07 am
CommentAs stated, this is going to be a key referral for the (further) construction – and de facto unification (!) [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:59 am
Facts: This case (Jones et al v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
The Brandenburg v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 8:50 am
In Commissioner v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
The first is that the decision of the German state to intervene as a third party in this case is much more important than one might think. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, DeVillier v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:51 am
The lease contained a choice-of-law clause in favor of the law of that state and was drafted in the language of that state. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 4:28 am
V. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am
German colonies, for instance, were not considered part of the German Reich, yet not treated as a separate state, but as “protectorates. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm
This is a view that has been endorsed by English judges in Lawlor (at para 3) and Aquavita International SA v Ashapura Minecham Ltd [2014] EWHC 2806 (Comm) [20], citing inter alia, older editions of Plender and Wilderpin. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am
V–Sketch of the Geology of Mississippi Art. [read post]
