Search for: "Gibson v. State of California" Results 61 - 80 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Tuesday, Nov. 2 Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of California, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Ford Harrison issued a Legal Alert: California Court of Appeal Clarifies Meal and Rest Period Requirements for California Employees Wilson Sonsini put out a WSGR alert: California Appellate Court Clarifies Employers' Obligations Regarding Meal Period and Rest Breaks Littler told us how they really felt with: A Ray of Hope: California Court of Appeal Decides Compliance with Meal Period Obligations Requires an Opportunity, Not a Guarantee Gibson… [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm by Bona Law PC
Perhaps recognizing the problem with this, the issue again came before the US Supreme Court in California v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Chamber's Faces of Lawsuit Abuse on Gibson Guitar raid] Would a minimalist state funded by Pigouvian taxes run a budget surplus? [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
California Hospital Medical Center (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 498, 502.) [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
People who care about the campaign finance issue should keep an eye on what’s happening in California, where a member of the California legislature last week (re)initiated the process of placing on the November general election ballot an advisory measure, Proposition 49, that would ask for the voters’ answer to the following question:Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to… [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:01 am
Regents of the University of California, 293 U.S. 245 (1934); Meyer v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:34 am by Broc Romanek
PCAOB Chairman Doty remarked that the proposed standards - running to almost 300 pages - mark a "watershed moment" for auditing in the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 9:47 am
Siegel (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 1087)In California, litigants are expected to pay for their own attorney's fees unless there is a special law or contract provision stating otherwise. [read post]