Search for: "Ginsberg v. New York"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 1:14 pm
Under the Ginsberg v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
New York (1968), that upheld a general ban on the distribution of “harmful-to-minors” material to children: “[T]he prohibition against sales to minors [in the New York statute] does not bar parents who so desire from purchasing the magazines for their children. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
" New York Attorney General Eric T. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
" New York Attorney General Eric T. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:20 pm
New York. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:38 am
Not only did this language cause the warrant to fail under Fourth Amendment scrutiny, but it also required the officers to execute judgment calls and seize items they should not have.For the article from the New York Times, click here. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:56 pm
And lest you think the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times took Justice Ginsberg out of context, you can watch the entire interview to see for your self. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:42 am
Supreme Court Issues Opinion in Maples v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm
Today the Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Golan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in New York which found in favor of Fox Television that the FCC had not properly followed procedures in creating the rule. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Judge Ginsberg on the D.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
District Court of the Southern District of New York relied on the federal common law of arbitrability rather than state-law public policy in invalidating an arbitration provision, an issue not addressed in Concepcion. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
§ 1114(a)) under federal law, and unfair competition under New York state law. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:30 am
Trippe Fried shared the news that InHouse Legal recently opened a New York office. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
Karlseng v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:34 am
New York allowed the state to apply an age-adjusted standard for its restriction on the sale of obscene materials to minors. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
The statute defined violent games in a way that "mimics the New York statute regulating obscenity-for-minors that we upheld in Ginsberg v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
“Because speech about violence is not obscene, it is of no consequence that California’s statute mimics the New York statute regulating obscenity-for-minors that we upheld in Ginsberg v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
Even though the standards of the law are borrowed largely from similar laws related to the distribution of sexually themed materials to minors (see Ginsberg v. [read post]
