Search for: "Givens v. Quinn"
Results 61 - 80
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
Given the precision of the standards, allowing anyone, whether expert or plaintiff, to testify based on observations unsupported by measurements is a dubious proposition. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:26 pm
And while Apple hasn't sued anyone over a SEP yet (thus I haven't had the opportunity to remind them of their FRAND obligations), I lashed out at them when they described a $40 per-device damages claim over five software patents as a "reasonable royalty," given that "reasonable" is the "FR" part of "FRAND" (and the "ND" part wasn't put before the Apple v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:11 am
Some more German Qualcomm v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm
That's why Qualcomm's counsel, Quinn Emanuel's Dr. [read post]
Patent office and Qualcomm's litigation tactics render prof's fanboy testimony on patents unreliable
23 Jan 2019, 8:08 am
The combination of two Apple v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Given the uncertainty, three vehicles were invoked by the same party to get into the court of appeals for a second opinion: (1) Notice of regular appeal, should the order compelling multi-party arbitration be deemed final; (2) notice of interlocutory (accelerated) appeal otherwise; and (3) petition for mandamus, in case appellate jurisdiction was found to be lacking. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
However, given Chief Judge Merrick Garland’s unsuccessful nomination, Ginsburg’s decision seems more justifiable because the confirmation of a successor appointed by Obama might not have been guaranteed. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:57 am
In Huawei v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm
The day before the FTC v. [read post]
The patent defendant's dilemma in Munich: damned if you do, damned if you don't give up your secrets
23 Dec 2018, 9:59 pm
The shocking part about last Thursday's Qualcomm v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 5:53 am
Qualcomm; Southern District of California: Apple and contract manufacturers v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 12:13 am
Oherwise, you need a new proceeding on the merits and a new injunction (as mentioned, for instance, in the Apple v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 6:13 am
Apple v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 4:13 am
If we now apply the only reasonable interpretation of "only" in the given context--a filter--to the Qualcomm v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:54 am
The U.S. district court will hold a trial in December, and the purpose of the injunction is to bar Huawei from leveraging two Chinese patent injunctions (granted by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court) before Judge Orrick has the chance to adjudicate a related claim.Like in the court below, Quinn Emanuel, as counsel for Samsung, is defending the Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:42 pm
In that widely debated opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Thus the appeal in Janus v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
The Martin-Quinn Scores are based on data collected with this in mind. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
In its 2014 decision Harris v. [read post]
