Search for: "Givens v. Rose" Results 61 - 80 of 1,032
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bennett Capers's "The Crime of Loving: Loving, Lawrence, and Beyond," which appears in Loving v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:33 am
" It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:08 am by Broc Romanek
Here is their interview on Charlie Rose - and here is their interview from "The Daily Show. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Rose, that a married co-parent of the same sex could invoke the marital presumption.) [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:35 am by Juggalo Law
That guy.Now that Christian conservative groups have given up trying to convince young people that gay marriage is wrong, they can redouble their efforts on the cinematic front. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am by Dave
  However, the council had dealt with that point in the Mohammed letter and, as Rose J put it at [43]: … [T]the Judge paid no attention to the point Mr Bolton made about the demands of other homeless applicants, nor did he explain how Mr Freeman-Roach would be prejudiced in pursuing his appeal given that, as Mr Bolton noted, the appeal is on a point of law. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
Joseph, of Joseph & Hollander, won in State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am by CMS
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by a majority given in the judgment of Lady Rose. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
Given that most schools don't teach advertising law, what are the best courses to take? [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:46 am by Peter Groves
Thanks to Jane Lambert and her NIPC Law blog for drawing my attention to Jaguar Land Rover Ltd v Twisted Automotive Ltd [2018] EWHC 3536 (Ch) (20 December 2018) which is a judgment of Rose J in an appeal against the 15 May 2018 (O-289-18) decision of Ms Louise White acting for the Registrar of Trade Marks. [read post]
Given her personal beliefs and judicial philosophy, many observers have suggested that she may be open to reviewing and possibly overturning Roe v. [read post]