Search for: "Good v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 61 - 80
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2023, 5:40 am
V V lodged an appeal in the High Court, which was heard by Judicial Commissioner Goh Yi Han (“Goh JC”).Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed and the V V Mark was refused registration. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Normally, having choices is a good thing. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
VVF Intervest, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
So far I’ve read and very much enjoyed the articles from Tom Barnett (DOJ), Luke Froeb and Pingping Shan, and Sean Gates (the others look good too). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 8:06 pm
Quebec (Attorney General) and R. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:07 pm
Under Mezibov v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
Would that be correct? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
Two of the foremost spokesmodels for the cause, Cy Vance and Bill Bratton, continue to push the buttons that are working so very well At a news conference last week after the debate erupted in California, the New York City police commissioner, William J. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Aren’t Settlement Agreements Good? [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:06 pm
In Stark v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
Bd. of Commissioners of Louisiana Stadium and Exposition Dist., 2020 WL 5309962 (E.D. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
In Vidal-Hall v Google Inc (Information Commissioner intervening) [2015] EWCA Civ 311 the Court of Appeal concluded that the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights required the remedy of compensation where distress had been suffered as a result of a breach of duty. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:00 am
In particular, the Court will decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against an unsuccessful regulator (except for good reason). [read post]
Blocking orders against ISPs to combat trade-mark infringement legal says Court of Appeal in Cartier
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
This duty, which equity will enforce with an injunction, was described in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 as follows: ” If a man has in his possession or control goods the dissemination of which, whether in the way of trade or, possibly, merely by way of gifts (see Upmann v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am
Again, Commissioner Wilson noticed. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Oregon, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was not within his wheelhouse when he regulated health care tax credits in King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
In particular, was the Court of Appeal correct to decide that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against a regulator if it has been unsuccessful, except for a good reason, or is the starting point instead that an order for costs should be made against the regulator where it is unsuccessful? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am
On 7 December 2011, the judge gave his full reasons for making this unusual order (Law Society (and others) v Rick Kordowski [2011] EWHC 3185 (QB)). [read post]
