Search for: "Goode v. Department of Health" Results 61 - 80 of 2,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case is now unfolding anew in the Fourth Circuit (Liberty University v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:30 am by Darius
Reference may also be made to the Mental Health Commission's Report on the Operation of Part 2 of the Mental Health Act 2001 (2008) and the Department of Health and Children's Review of the Operation of the Mental Health Act 2001: Findings and Conclusions (2007). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Public Health Laurie Beyranevand, Vermont Law School, Can Revised Standards of Identify Achieve Greater Public Health Outcomes? [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
Department of Public Health, the landmark Massachusetts Supreme Court case which held that it was unconstitutional in Massachusetts to prohibit same-sex marriage. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It should be read together with the Court’s judgment in R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 38. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 10:32 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The defendant physician was employed in the emergency department of the hospital. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Stephen Lee
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:30 am by Ken Gibson
Brian Lutmer, Carol Zurfluh and Christopher Long with the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, State Public Health Laboratory, Breath Alcohol Program, and the Saint Louis University Toxicology Laboratory, Toxicology Department conducted a study to answer such a question. [read post]